Tag Archives | Paul Vandenberg
Economics, Health, Social development and protection
Economics, Education
Economics
Agriculture and natural resources
Networks and technologies to assist the vulnerable during the pandemic
Developed countries can use advanced social security systems to protect households from the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, but developing countries face a bigger challenge. They typically have a large informal sector and limited social security coverage, which hinder the delivery of assistance at short notice. Yet, developing Asia is better equipped to cushion the economic impact of the current crisis compared to the global financial crisis of 2008.
Benefits of education and training for SMEs in Asia
The importance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to economies in Asia is well known. They account for over 95% of all businesses, a third to half of aggregate output, and the majority of enterprise employment (Vandenberg, Chantapacdepong, and Yoshino 2016). We also know that SMEs do not have an easy life. They struggle to get established, face a higher failure rate than large firms, and lack access to key inputs such as finance. Finding ways to increase their survival rate and growth is important for expanding private sector activity in Asia’s developing economies. Sustaining enterprises requires that they are competitive; competitiveness, in turn, is based on productivity.
Middle-income economies: Slowdowns, traps and transitions
The notion of a middle-income trap has generated much interest and discussion, but little consensus. There is no agreement on what the trap is or how long a country needs to be at the middle-income stage to be considered trapped. Much of the current discussion is about growth slowdowns, but is a slowdown the same as a trap? It is also possible that the trap does exist but we do not know what causes it.
New Zealand: A farming and services growth model for Asia?
The story of East Asia’s rapid growth includes ample reference to the export of technologically complex manufactured goods, such as cars and computers. This is the model that has characterized Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Taipei,China. It also provides an example for Asia’s current middle-income countries, including the People’s Republic of China (PRC). They need to develop high-value manufacturing, the argument goes, churning out domestically designed goods or linking into global production networks. Failure to move up the value chain may result in a country getting stuck in the middle-income trap (Zhuang et al. 2012).
Search
Subscribe / Connect to Asia Pathways
Subjects
- Agriculture and natural resources
- Blog
- Capacity development
- Climate change
- Economics
- Education
- Energy
- Environment
- Finance sector development
- Gender
- Governance and public sector management
- Health
- Industry and trade
- Information and Communications Technology
- Infrastructure
- Miscellaneous
- Population
- Poverty
- Private sector development
- Regional cooperation and integration
- Sanitation
- Social development and protection
- Transport
- Uncategorized
- Urban development
- Video Blog
- Water
Recent Posts
- Transforming ASEAN: Advancing Regional Integration, Social Inclusion, and Environmental Sustainability
- Development of the Creative Economy in Asia and the Pacific
- Kashima City’s Great Transformation: Where Industry Meets Community
- Mechanization Driving the Future of Agriculture in Asia
- Natural Capital: Valuing Nature to Protect and Restore Ecosystem Services for Sustainable Development
Recent Comments